Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by KKisser View Post
Quote Originally Posted by KKisser View Post

not if they're fighting for pacs wbo welterweight belt. then i think there shouldn't even be a catchweight.
A Pac fan against a catch weight? I guess it's just when it's for Pac's belt. I hate catch weights too, but not only when "fighting for pacs wbo welterweight belt"
where does it say that if you're a pac fan you're automatically stupid? i've always been consistent with the catchweight thing for a title belt. you can search my views on the pac-cotto catchweight fight. but i guess now that the shoe is on the other foot noone is making an issue out of it.
That's because nobody (thank God) believes that piece of jewelry means anything.
well it certainly felt like it meant something to a lot of people before when they belligerently argued that pacquiao shouldn't be fighting for it at a catchweight. lol

i don't think a title especially a world title should be on the line if a fight is fought at a catchweight, but in this case i'll probably make an exception coz it'll make for a more interesting match and the powers that be already made a mockery of the title division championships anyways.