Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Super heavyweight?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,829
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    795
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavyweight?

    We don't have enought talent for a single decent heavyweight division and so the idea of splitting it in two seems crazy to me.

    There have ALWAYS been giants in the heavyweight division.

    Bill Tate was 6'6 and 230ish in Dempsey's era
    Fred Fulton was 6'5, 220 around WWI
    Carl Morris was 6'4 230
    Jess Willard was another 6'5, 240 guy.
    The above all fought when most heavies were 200 or under.

    Primo Carnera was what 6'5 240?
    Buddy Baer was 6'6 240
    Abe Simon was 6'4 250 with an 82 inch reach
    Joe Louis drilled each of the above

    Evander gave up 3 inches in height and 20+ pounds against both Holyfield and Bowe and he competed well with both. Chris Chambers dominated Dimitrenko.

    It really isn't the size alone. It is being good! Or in the case of the rest of today's heavies, being bad!

    On a related note ESPN classic showed a fascinating fight last night. ATG feather Sandy Saddler, 5'10, reach like a gorilla, took on 5'2 inch, alligator armed Charley Riley. Riley kept boring in and taking the fight to Saddler. It ended up a majority decision for Saddler, but a competitive fight all the way.
    Last edited by marbleheadmaui; 07-06-2011 at 09:54 PM.
    Hidden Content Bring me the best and I will knock them out-Alexis Arguello
    I'm not God, but I am something similar-Robert Duran

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavyweight?

    Quote Originally Posted by marbleheadmaui View Post
    We don't have enought talent for a single decent heavyweight division and so the idea of splitting it in two seems crazy to me.

    There have ALWAYS been giants in the heavyweight division.

    Bill Tate was 6'6 and 230ish in Dempsey's era
    Fred Fulton was 6'5, 220 around WWI
    Carl Morris was 6'4 230
    Jess Willard was another 6'5, 240 guy.
    The above all fought when most heavies were 200 or under.

    Primo Carnera was what 6'5 240?
    Buddy Baer was 6'6 240
    Abe Simon was 6'4 250 with an 82 inch reach
    Joe Louis drilled each of the above

    Evander gave up 3 inches in height and 20+ pounds against both Holyfield and Bowe and he competed well with both. Chris Chambers dominated Dimitrenko.

    It really isn't the size alone. It is being good! Or in the case of the rest of today's heavies, being bad!

    On a related note ESPN classic showed a fascinating fight last night. ATG feather Sandy Saddler, 5'10, reach like a gorilla, took on 5'2 inch, alligator armed Charley Riley. Riley kept boring in and taking the fight to Saddler. It ended up a majority decision for Saddler, but a competitive fight all the way.
    i'm pretty sure you meant Lewis there lol, and lets not forget how he was ripped off against Valuev

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavyweight?

    Cruiserweight 175-195 (there's too much of a gap b/w 175 and 200)
    Heavyweight 195-225
    Super Heavyweight 225-270
    Titanweight 270+

    I think that's fair, and more appropriate to the diversity of heavyweights out there from all over the globe.

    Alot of the oft criticized overweight heavyweights would have to get fit to make the 225 limit, as they wouldn't want to be sticking around in Klitschko territory.

    Presumably there would be no minimum weight requirements for super heavyweight or titanweight championship fights, so the smaller guys could take on the challenge if they are good enough.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super heavyweight?

    I do not want to see another weight division, the cruiserweight went up a bit in their limit but changing the heavyweight division will kill the boxing game totally. I sincerely believe a Mike Tyson will beat these super heavies as would Ali and Foreman, so if you are good enough you are big enough.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Super heavy? Super stupid
    By Lance Uppercut in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-28-2010, 05:30 PM
  2. There needs to be a super heavyweight division
    By bikersk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 12:18 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-28-2007, 11:24 AM
  4. Is it time for a Super Heavyweight division?
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 07-03-2006, 07:05 AM
  5. Super-Heavyweight ?
    By Sugar_Shaw in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-30-2006, 02:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing