Thanks: 0
Likes: 1
Dislikes: 0
swansonTVdinnersSADDO.jpg
You a turkey dinna
Last edited by brocktonblockbust; 12-25-2014 at 07:38 PM.
What is this, the "EXPOSURE OF EARNIE SHAVERS WEEK".
We all know that Earnie Shavers is far below normal intelligence. And we all know that is a typical thing from boxers from what I call the "punch-bag eras" of boxing.
Pre-defence eras. Pre-80's era's.
So let's take a look at these guys statements...
Lyle was knocked out by Foreman, yet Lyle wasted Shavers. Foreman was obviously the hardest puncher LYle fought.
Ali was stopped by Holmes and knocked down very many times, pretty much knocked out by Cooper. Shavers never managed to knock Ali down.
Mike Tyson dealt Holmes his only canvas KO of career, Holmes beat Shavers 2ce. Tyson was obviously the hardest hitter Holmes ever faced.
All 3 are full of shit and exposed as the biggest crap artists in the sport as far as fighters go, exceeded in stupidity only by Shavers himself!
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
The real question is WHY these guys lie.
2 reasons have been put forward.
(a) The body as a defence mechanism, shuts down it's pain mechanism from the hardest of punches or maybe because the power of the blow is so severe that it simply concusses the victim so badly that they are unable to remember it properly. This point seems almost too stupid to mention but apparently has gone unthought of from OTNB sources.
(b) Shavers stands at a pinnacle position in the house of cards that is the golden era of boxing. Bummifying Shavers, bummifys the whole era. By pumping up Shavers as a decent opponent, all of the golden era boxers who beat him pump up their own wins and glorify themselves for having beaten somebody as dangerous as Shavers and completely ignore the fact that despite nearly 100 fights, Shavers never won against a decent opponent with the single exception being Ken Norton.
Funny enough, the Klitschko opponent Samuel Peter can be described as a "Super-Shavers", stylistically similar except much stronger in every way, heavier, more muscular, physically stronger, tougher chin and durability, much more powerful punch. Yet Peter is ironically slammed often, even though he was a world champ and Shavers is promoted, despite the fact he was not 1/5th the fighter Peter was and was never a world champ.
Only in OTNB land![]()
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Array
I'd take this guy I think,
He had a 17” neck, 15” biceps, a 42 ½” inch chest and a 73” reach
He had huge shoulders and massive back muscles. He was known for his quick hands, debilitating left jab, crushing hook, powerful right cross, smashing uppercut and devastating body punches. He was equally adept at punching from long range or short punches at close range. When he had his opponent hurt he was a deadly finisher.
He was master at the art of feinting.
He was also an outstanding defensive fighter. A master at blocking an opponents leads with an open glove with the rear hand in proper position, a master glove blocker and counter puncher as well as a fighter who would duck and counter putting his whole body into his blows. He had the perfect balance, timing and leverage of a great puncher.
Mike Silver stated ;Quite possibly the greatest fighter who ever lived, Langford mastered every punch. His short hook on the inside and his right cross and uppercut were particularly deadly. His punishing jab was also one of the best. He was a strategist who knew how to maneuver, with the ability to explode out of an offensive or defensive position. He could instantly stop when retreating, revert to the offensive, and in the blink of an eye render an opponent unconscious with trip-hammer blows thrown in four and five punch combinations. Langford's every move embodied the technique of a studied master boxer. During his prime he was rarely outfought, out-thought, or out-punched.
William Detloff wrote,Ring founder Nat Fleischer reported:he wasn't simply an all out slugger. He was smart and crafty and knew how to out-think guys in the ring. He could fight inside or outside and was impossibly strong. He was decades ahead of his time.Norman Clark who saw him fight on his tour of England wrote,All in the Game 1935 said;He was as quick and slippery as an eel in action, highly intelligent and made up of surprising dodges from head to heels. Sam used his bulky shoulders and clever blocking arms to avoid blows and his potent punching power stayed with him until the end of his career.R. Stockton stated,For working up speed he had Jimmy Walsh, the bantamweight champion of the world, with him. The pair used to box together lightly, but at a great pace, and I was surprised to find that even in this sort of work Sam was every bit as fast and clever as Walsh himself.He had all the attributes of a great fighter, speed, punching power, an amazingly elusive defense, the ability to absorb punishment, and unlimited endurance.
Al Laney wrote,Harry Wills described in the February 1953 Boxing and Wrestling Magazine what his knockout losses to him were like. Wills said he was hit so hard each time that he doesn’t remember being knocked out!This is the man competent critics said was the greatest fighter in ring history, the man the champions feared and would not fight, the man who was so good he was never given a chance to show how good he really was.Jack Dempsey just like Johnson wanted nothing to do with him and in his autobiographyI was knocked out three times in my career, twice by him and in my last fight by Paulino Uzcudun. I still don't know, except from hearsay, what punches he used to knock me out. The first time it happened was 1914. We were supposed to go twenty rounds, when the fourteenth began I was going easy. He was in a bad way. I backed him around the ring trying to set him up for a one punch finish. His eye was bleeding and the last thing I remember was having him against the ropes just about five feet from his corner. It must have happened right then.
he admitted it saying,Johnson did fight him once but he was a 20 year old and a lightweight at the time and the 28 year old Johnson outweighed him by 50 pounds and Johnson even in his win mew he was lucky that he got to the kid when he did. He would say later,The Hell I feared no man. There was one man, he was even smaller than I, and I wouldn’t fight because I knew he would flatten me. I was afraid of himJim Flynn, said of his punching power:I don’t want to fight that little smoke,” said Johnson. “He’s got a chance to win against anyone in the world. I’m the first black champion and I’m going to be the last.In the end the official record has him at over 300 fights but the real tally is most likely much more then that. He knocked out virtually every top heavyweight he faced with most of them being men who were also ducked by the likes of Johnson and Dempsey. With 140 ko's on his official record, he blasts out the records of guys like Tyson and Foreman combined or any other heavyweight duo.I fought most of the heavyweights, including [Jack] Dempsey and [Jack] Johnson, but he could strength a guy colder than any of them. When he hit me it felt like someone slugged me with a baseball bat
A few months before his death, he said,“Don’t nobody need to feel sorry for old Sam. I had plenty of good times. I been all over the world. I fought maybe 600 fights, and every one was a pleasure!”
Given his size in comparison to all others, in my mind he's the biggest puncher in heavyweight history.
He had to have been given the disparities. He fought for 24 years until he was pulled out of the ring when totally blind and never got a title shot other then Gans and Walcott at lower weights. By all accounts he beat Barbadoes Joe and beat Gans for his first loss in ten tears but was 2 pounds over on fight night so never got the title.
Last edited by IamInuit; 01-01-2015 at 10:24 PM.
Ernie Shavers was a bad ass . 76 wins 68 KOs. FACT. CASE CLOSED. GIVE SOME RESPECT.
All boxers are bad ass, otherwise they would not be boxers.
Earnie Shavers PROPER analysis...
If you exclude all opponents who have been KO'ed before and all opponents who had a loss within 1 year of their encounter with Shavers (a typical thing for cherry-pickers), it turns out that Shavers
KO'ed only 10 guys (median weight 201 lbs), of which 8 guys were bums (like Young Agabab 0-1, 196 lbs, or Steve Carter 15-7, 190 lbs), and only 2 were somewhat good: Howard Smith (17-2, 202 lbs) and Tony Perea (KO7) (16-1, 206 lbs).
Earnie Shavers = Cherry Picker, FACT
Earnie Shavers KO ratio all opponents = 90% (extremely hard puncher)
Earnie Shavers KO ratio vs 200+ opponents = 68% (hard puncher)
Earnie Shavers KO ratio vs 215+ opponents = 47% (featherfist)
Earnie shavers = Cruiser cruncher
Earnie Shavers = superheavyweight featherfist
Earnie Shavers needed 21 rounds per KO as opposed to all other modern power punchers who needed between 5-7 rounds per KO like Lamon Brewster, Shannon Briggs, Mike Tyson, Lewis, both Klitschko's etc. He has nothing in common with REAL power punchers.
Shavers famous 28 KO streak is reduce to a streak of 2 opponents in a row, once you exclude cruisers, bums and overlate round 13+ KO's. The lowest streak possible.
CONCLUSION: Shavers was a cherry picking, cruiser crunching, bum-buster with no appreciable skills whatsoever and a featherfist punch when viewed against TODAY'S criteria and failed against bigger and against quality opposition.
These are the facts. Case Closed.
Myth exposed.
Myth exposed.
Myth exposed.
![]()
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Did Earnie ass-rape your mom? Because your "analyses" are a bunch of ho-hokum to the Umpteenth Degree. Meaningless comparisons and subjective "conclusions".
The Black Destroyer must a had a big dick as well as the NUMBER ONE PUNCH for all that old man butt hurt you're showing.
There was nothing "SUBJECTIVE" whatsoever in my analysis of Shavers. Mine was COMPLETELY objective utilising nothing except the actual records of Shavers and his opponents and comparing it with other boxers records. There can BE no more objective analysis.
The only comment subjective was that Earnie had no appreciable skills. An argument I doubt you would seriously want to challenge
Well blockbust, you seem to be able to tell me all about Earnies big dick, so I'm sure you've been more well acquainted with it than I'll ever be. No wonder you support the bum so much, your riding him!lol
"Enough with the games mate! Your messing with the Grand Master!"
Lennox Lewis
Array
Array
You cant debate this kind of shit Brock. Well you can but I'm done really. These daily crucifixions of all time greats and misrepresentation of what people even say about them is simply over the top. I'll simply spend less time here is all. Last week it felt like this was Earnie Shavers.com....the dark side.
These dipshits cant even come to grips with giving a puncher credit for being a puncher. Its beyond addressing anymore. So now I simply don't read a thing they say or respond. Its really quite liberating even though I rarely responded to begin with. These are the same people that a few centuries ago insisted the world was flat.
Ps-I only responded here because you were the author. So I wont be back to this thread either.
And remember that famous saying often credited to Mr.Twain, "never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"
Peace
Wednesday ~ September 22, 1971
Sierra Tahoe ~ Reno, Nevada
Earnie Shavers ~ 29-2-0 {29 KO's} ~ 207 lbs.
vs.
Larry 'Irish Pat' Duncan ~ 19-3-1 {15 KO's} ~ 203 lbs.
"For the USA Nevada State Heavyweight Championship"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnie Shavers {Age; 26 years, 1 month} is looking to add his '1st' Championship
to his mantel.
Larry 'Irish Pat' Duncan {Age; 22 years, 9 months} is a sharp-hitting puncher, who
has surprising power.
'Irish Pat' is now based out of Carson City, Nevada - and will be the local favorite.
Last edited by Bill Paxtom; 12-29-2014 at 05:35 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks