
Originally Posted by
ross

Originally Posted by
AdamGB
Master said he doubted Reid would beat Froch, I pointed out that he had lost to Froch, but not during Reid's prime. I added my opinion that I thought Froch would likely beat him in his prime too.
That's it. Do you think I was trying to infer something more than that?
You brought up the result of the fight as if it was relevant but as I pointed out, beating a 37 year old Reid is as relevant as Calzaghes win over Eubank, Marcianos over Louis and Holmes over Ali.
Relevant to what exactly? I replied directly to Master because I wasn't sure if he knew the two had met, that's it. I can't simplify it for you any more, I wish I could!...
If I was trying to make more of it than that then I wouldn't have went out of my way to point out that Reid was old at the time would I?!
Jesus... Only you would get excited over and try to dissect such a simple post...

Bookmarks