Personally, I don't recall ever making outrageous excuses or disappearing from the forum when a fav fighter of mine loses. Onix, you're free to look up any examples to the contrary.
Hey, if Cotto loses, obviously it won't be due to any plaster this time. I'm sure Margacheato's wraps will be looked at under a microscope. And Cotto I believe has prepared as well as I guess he's capable of preparing. (I'm not necessarily happy that he changed from Emanuel Stewart to this unknown entity, but that's another story).
No... if Cotto loses, I'll accept it and move on. I'll still be here, taking my lumps along with the rest of the Cotto fans. I'll still be a Cotto fan..... and I'll still hate Margacheato's guts (for the piece of shit human being I believe he is). But I'll accept defeat graciously.
How's that?
The key is Self-discipline.
Onix, this is just my opinion, but..... if Margarito wins again, obviously it will be fair-and-square, especially with all the scrutiny he's undergoing. BUT.... it doesn't rule out that he may have cheated in the first fight.
Remember:
1. He was caught trying to cheat against Mosely. That alone can cast a reasonable doubt over previous fights, especially since Cotto's face was so badly damaged from those blows. Other fighters, including Cotto have gotten hit that many times before and not suffered the damage Cotto did.
2. Among the pluses and minuses for this upcoming fight, Margarito holds one particular edge over Cotto.... the psychological edge. Once you've taking such a pounding like Cotto did, it's hard to overcome that when you're facing the same fighter again. Cotto may have bounced back against other opponents after Margarito, but we don't know until the bell sounds how he'll react to getting hit by Margarito again.
Finally..... win or lose, Margarito has made it his business to be seen as the bad guy. He says so himself. So much so, and such a good job he's done.... that I've gotten caught up in the hate. Interestingly enough, I didn't hate Margarito when he was first making a name for himself. He seemed like a personable enough dude. But then you start adding up all the stuff he does and the way he acts.... and it's gotten so I just can't stand the guy.
I don't think Margarito has the psychological edge. If you watch the Kellerman interview, Margarito is very excitable as he reminds Cotto and Kellerman that he won the first fight, and Cotto is very calm as he, "Yes, and I've lived with that." If Margarito cheated in the first fight, then he may have to convince himself that he could win without loaded gloves. And if Cotto thinks Margarito cheated, whether he did or not, and he seems to, then that sort of eliminates the typical psychological disadvantage. Cotto seems supremely confident to me; I think he's of the opinion that he never would have lost to Margarito without loaded gloves, and the gloves will be good this time, so no problem. Given the lingering doubts about the gloves in the first fight, and the pressure on Margarito to prove that he can beat Cotto fair and square, I think if anything, Cotto has a psychological edge, and their demeanors reflected that.
He might fight it harder to stand up to a guy who isn't weakened by a battering with loaded gloves.
Last edited by Onix; 12-01-2011 at 11:48 PM.
The key is Self-discipline.
Stupid is not something Cotto is. The dismissal of Stewart was planned. It's his build in excuse when he loses on Saturday. Planned damage control. It's not much. But what else is he gonna use? He's in excellent shape. His opponent is coming off a serious eye injury. It's just about a guarantee that the wraps will not be an issue. And he's pretty much fighting in his home field. It's not his home but he will have the crowd behind him. So there's nothing else he can point too. He knew that months ago. Releasing Stewart was pretty much his only option. Like I said it ain't much but it's something
lol
We've probably all posted senseless stuff before and later, in retrospect, we say to ourselves.... "Now why on Earth did I post something like that?"
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say this is probably the case with this particular statement.
C'mon man..... seriously?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks