Latest p4p rankings. Agree or disagree?

[TitoFan]

C'mon.... between you and me. You know Canelo has no business in the top 10 p4p list.



Take off your biased hat and put on your knowledgeable boxing hat.... that's right.
Now think about it.

Just trying to be helpful here.

A victory over Austin Trout. You know the guy who had his way with your Miguel Cotto means a lot more than wins over Matthew Macklin and Curtis Stevens combined. It's that simple. If you think otherwise than there really is no hope for you.

One meaningful victory, VD. ONE. There's a conga line of boxers out there with more than just the one meaningful victory who are a hell of a lot more deserving for a spot in the top ten p4p than Canelo.

Canelo is still on the way up, VD. But there's no shortcuts into the elite. That shit's got to be earned over time, and with a hell of a lot more than one meaningful opponent.

Golovkin ain't even got one yet. And you got him up there. You can't even follow your own stupid logic. I'm a big fan of Triple G. But lets be real here. Stevens and Macklin ain't big wins.

Yeah... you're right.
They're nowhere as big as a shot Shane Mosley and an undersized Josesito Lopez.

But hey it's my mistake.
Just goes to show you can't be civil to a proven moron.

I'm gonna make this question as idiot proof as possible for you. You have Golovkin over Alvarez on the list. Which of Golovkin wins is better than Alvarez win over Austin Trout? All you gotta do state a name. That's it. Just a name. Don't even try and a give a reason why you think it's better. You'll only embarrass yourself further with your nonsense. So just state a name. There's no way you can fuck this up. Just give a name

I'll give you 3 names. Three names of fighters who should easily rank ahead of Ginger in the p4p list. Matthysse, Donaire, and Mikey Garcia. Lucas and Nonito have lost... but each has a hell of a lot better resume than Ginger. I'll say it again, but my patience with your biased ignorance is wearing thin. One good fight does not a top 10 p4p fighter make. No matter how many times you may have serviced the young man.

Got it? Ginger's one good fight against a credible opponent does not warrant p4p consideration. To keep insisting that it does undermines your already ridiculously low credibility.

I knew you would fuck it up. You really are a fucking idiot. And what's funny is you can't even follow your own stupidity. Think about it. You say Alvarez one win over a credible opponent isn't enough. But some how Golovkin 0 wins over credible opponents is enough. And you wonder why they laugh at you

You can't defend having Ginger in the top 10 p4p, so you resort to our infantile insults.
You're so pathetically predictable.

Go ahead... buy yourself some monogrammed kneepads for when you're deep-throating Ginger like you've done MargaCheato, the panty-wearing JCC Jr., and all the scumbags you so lustily defend.

I'm just calling you out on your moronic nonsense. You say Alvarez shouldn't be consider cuz he has only one quality win. But some how Golovkin with no quality wins can be considered. You make this to fucking easy. Go ahead defend your stupidity. I dare you. But you won't. You think ignoring it will just make it go away. It don't work that. Stupidity should never be ignored. It needs to be pointed out and laughed at. Now you know why the forum is always laughing at you

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

[TitoFan]

Chavez Sr. Responds To Canelo's Career Comments - Boxing News



This from the guy who fought 45 cab drivers in Mexico to start his career. Let me tell you.... if Chavez Sr., who also has brought along his coddled son.... says that Canelo is being handled with "tweezers"..... that's saying something.

Between the three of them, they can write a book on starting off a career fighting bums.
Go ahead and defend that, lame brain.
But first take Ginger's member out of your mouth.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

[TitoFan]

Danny Garcia and Lucas Matthysse both deserve p4p over Canelo, thus bumping Canelo from the top 10. Now..... stop talking about Golovkin just because you have no true defense for Ginger. Just because you deep-throat Ginger on a regular basis does not qualify him for the p4p list. Live with it.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

I'll try this one more time.

Forget Golovkin. You don't think he deserves top 10 p4p consideration? Fine. MY point is that Canelo does NOT. There are at least 10 other fighters who would bump him off the list. The fact that you insist on putting him there after being told very good reasons why he shouldn't, doesn't speak highly of your ability to be objective. But we all know you're not very objective when it comes to Mexican fighters, so we'll just leave it at that.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

I'll try this one more time.

Forget Golovkin. You don't think he deserves top 10 p4p consideration? Fine. MY point is that Canelo does NOT. There are at least 10 other fighters who would bump him off the list. The fact that you insist on putting him there after being told very good reasons why he shouldn't, doesn't speak highly of your ability to be objective. But we all know you're not very objective when it comes to Mexican fighters, so we'll just leave it at that.

My point isn't weather Alvarez deserves to be in the top 10 or not. It's that he deserves it over Golovklin. I pressed you on Golovkin cuz I knew you couldn't defend it. Good to see you just decided to take your loss.

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

I'll try this one more time.

Forget Golovkin. You don't think he deserves top 10 p4p consideration? Fine. MY point is that Canelo does NOT. There are at least 10 other fighters who would bump him off the list. The fact that you insist on putting him there after being told very good reasons why he shouldn't, doesn't speak highly of your ability to be objective. But we all know you're not very objective when it comes to Mexican fighters, so we'll just leave it at that.

My point isn't weather Alvarez deserves to be in the top 10 or not. It's that he deserves it over Golovklin. I pressed you on Golovkin cuz I knew you couldn't defend it. Good to see you just decided to take your loss.

My point on Canelo vs GGG is the following:

Golovkin's from frigging Kazakhstan. Already starting off on the wrong foot when compared with Canelo. No hype machine for GGG. You can't compare the beginnings of a guy from a country many people don't know about, with the silver spoon beginnings of a red-headed Mexican fighter with choir boy looks, who was getting hyped and promoted from the very beginning. Even Chavez Sr. says Canelo has been coddled. And that's saying a lot.

Golovkin has defended his WBA middleweight title 9 times. And many of those in different countries of the world. No hometown advantage for GGG. He's had to earn every single one of those victories. Unlike Canelo, who's fought most of his fights either in Mexico or Las Vegas, which these days is pretty much like fighting in Mexico.

Worthy opponents or not, Golovkin is undefeated. Canelo's people slipped up when they put him up against Mayweather. They got overly excited with Canelo's lone win against a good opponent (Trout), and made the mistake of thinking he belonged in the same ring with Mayweather. They were wrong. The schooling of Canelo by Floyd should in itself raise a flag about Canelo belonging in the top 10 p4p. Like I've always said, Cotto did 10 times better against Floyd than Canelo did.


But we've made progress. You finally agree that Canelo does not belong in the top 10 p4p. We still disagree on Canelo vs GGG, but that's understandable. I don't think you're very objective with Canelo. Were we to argue about where JMM belongs on the list, that would be a different story. No differences of opinion there. But with Canelo we've always disagreed.

[Violent Demise]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

I'll try this one more time.

Forget Golovkin. You don't think he deserves top 10 p4p consideration? Fine. MY point is that Canelo does NOT. There are at least 10 other fighters who would bump him off the list. The fact that you insist on putting him there after being told very good reasons why he shouldn't, doesn't speak highly of your ability to be objective. But we all know you're not very objective when it comes to Mexican fighters, so we'll just leave it at that.

My point isn't weather Alvarez deserves to be in the top 10 or not. It's that he deserves it over Golovklin. I pressed you on Golovkin cuz I knew you couldn't defend it. Good to see you just decided to take your loss.

My point on Canelo vs GGG is the following:

Golovkin's from frigging Kazakhstan. Already starting off on the wrong foot when compared with Canelo. No hype machine for GGG. You can't compare the beginnings of a guy from a country many people don't know about, with the silver spoon beginnings of a red-headed Mexican fighter with choir boy looks, who was getting hyped and promoted from the very beginning. Even Chavez Sr. says Canelo has been coddled. And that's saying a lot.

Golovkin has defended his WBA middleweight title 9 times. And many of those in different countries of the world. No hometown advantage for GGG. He's had to earn every single one of those victories. Unlike Canelo, who's fought most of his fights either in Mexico or Las Vegas, which these days is pretty much like fighting in Mexico.

Worthy opponents or not, Golovkin is undefeated. Canelo's people slipped up when they put him up against Mayweather. They got overly excited with Canelo's lone win against a good opponent (Trout), and made the mistake of thinking he belonged in the same ring with Mayweather. They were wrong. The schooling of Canelo by Floyd should in itself raise a flag about Canelo belonging in the top 10 p4p. Like I've always said, Cotto did 10 times better against Floyd than Canelo did.


But we've made progress. You finally agree that Canelo does not belong in the top 10 p4p. We still disagree on Canelo vs GGG, but that's understandable. I don't think you're very objective with Canelo. Were we to argue about where JMM belongs on the list, that would be a different story. No differences of opinion there. But with Canelo we've always disagreed.

You should of just took the loss and left it alone. Golovkin was a highly decorated amateur. An Olympic Silver medalist and amateur world champion. He did not turn pro as some unknown. He had hype coming in. You don't know that cuz you just found out who the fuck he is. But others had been waiting for him to turn pro. Does he have the following Alvarez has? No. But to say he was some obscure nobody is inaccurate. His pro debut had been anticipated for awhile

[TitoFan]

Golovkin was a highly decorated amateur. An Olympic Silver medalist and amateur world champion. He did not turn pro as some unknown. He had hype coming in. You don't know that cuz you just found out who the fuck he is. But others had been waiting for him to turn pro. Does he have the following Alvarez has? No. But to say he was some obscure nobody is inaccurate. His pro debut had been anticipated for awhile

Didn't say GGG was a nobody. I said he was not as hyped from the beginning as Alvarez. Lots of Olympians have flopped in the big leagues. In the end it means nothing. It all boils down to what you said in BOLD.

I noticed you picked out that one point to try and further your argument.
But again, I'm not surprised, as you're prone to do that. No problem. It's a disagreement, is all.