Latest p4p rankings. Agree or disagree?

[TitoFan]

Funny how the forum clown feels he can "speak" for the forum.
Grow some balls and speak for yourself.

I'll dumb it down for you.
Golovkin is not a hype job like Alvarez.
It wasn't Golovkin that looked like an overhyped amateur against Floyd.
Golovkin didn't get fed with a silver spoon like Ginger.
Half the boxing world doesn't even know where Golovkin hails from..... whereas Ginger is such a Mexican hype job, even Chavez Sr. said as much.

But you go ahead, keep swallowing.

See how fucking easy it is? I play you the way Cotto plays with that guy in his bed. Got you saying stupid shit after stupid shit. Golovkin has no quality wins. What part of that don't you fucking understand? I know you just found out who Golovkin is. And I understand all the current PR fighters fucking suck. So you're looking for someone new to put in your mouth. And Golovkin has been very impressive. But he's not a top 10 pound for pound fighter yet. Why? Cuz he hasn't beaten a quality opponent yet. It's really not be that hard to understand.

You don't play with anything except maybe Ginger's balls. Why you going on about Golovkin still? 'Cause you can't defend Ginger on his own merits? Everyone can see right through you. You're a fake punk-ass bitch snot-nosed miserable little twat who obviously didn't get past a grade-school education. You put Ginger in the top 10. Tell us why. Nothing else needs to come out of your keyboard.

I already did stupid. Alvarez win over Austin Trout trumps Golovkin win over Macklin. Why? Cuz Trout is a better fighter than Macklin. Seriously it's not that hard to understand. Let me guess. You still don't get do you? Damn it sucks being you.

I already told you one good win doesn't qualify you for the top 10 p4p.
Don't fucking make me repeat myself. It's annoying.
Reading comprehension is supposed to be covered in grade school.

But no quality wins does, right?

Come on man. You can't be this stupid. You just can't be. Tell me you're acting or something. I refuse to believe someone can be this fucking stupid. It's not possible. It can't be

Still talking about GGG?? Damn.... you ARE a moron.
The fact that you ignored my comments on Danny Garcia and Matthysse prove one of three things:

a. You suffer from selective reading syndrome.
b. You're a fucking moron.
c. You're a fucking moron.

I have Garcia on the list. So why do I need to comment on him, stupid? And why are you refusing to answer the Golovkin question? Explain how he and his no quality wins deserves to be in the top 10?

I'll try this one more time.

Forget Golovkin. You don't think he deserves top 10 p4p consideration? Fine. MY point is that Canelo does NOT. There are at least 10 other fighters who would bump him off the list. The fact that you insist on putting him there after being told very good reasons why he shouldn't, doesn't speak highly of your ability to be objective. But we all know you're not very objective when it comes to Mexican fighters, so we'll just leave it at that.