Vasyl Lomachenko is P4P #1

[Fenster]

@Master - let me help you understand what answering a question means.

Quote 1 is your claim that the middleweights - Geale, Rubio, Wade, Murray and Monroe are better names than Brook.

1.

Geale, Rubio, Murray, Monroe or Wade are better names for GGG than Brook.

Quote 2 is your claim that they would all beat Brook.

2.

everyone of those middleweights would have beaten Brook. That is the reason he fights at welterweight.

I then asked you to explain WHY/HOW Brook did BETTER against Golovkin than the names listed. To which you replied in quotes 3, 4 and 5

3.

That was because GGG rattled him early in the first round and played with him even taking unnecessary punches because they had little affect on him.

What's this have to do with the question asked?

4.

So now you are comparing Brook to the great welterweights that challenged middleweights when you conveniently forgeting the fact that he only got his shot at GGG because Eubank Jnr turned it down and they had no decent opponent left.

Triple G even said that Brook should stay at welterweight because his punches had no effect. I do not need to take them when I can see GGG smiling at Brook's effort. Remind me again what weight Brook is campaigning in his next fight?

What's this have to do with the question asked?

5.

Everything I have stated are relevant facts as to why Brook is not better than the middleweights GGG has faced

.

Where? Where have you given a single relevant fact? Where have you explained that the middleweights are better than Brook? Please show me so I can consider your answer. Thanks.