Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Is JMM the no1 Lightweight in the world?

Results 1 to 15 of 93

Thread: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3373
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post

    That's right but at 130 & for the vacant Ring championship because they were rated at #1 & #2.

    So how exactly does that make Pacquiao the champion at 135?

    I'm not arguing that Pacquiao isn't arguably the better fighter but he ain't the champion! You can't rank #1 contender over the champion its just not logical!

    I don't know if you follow rugby but over here in NZ its our national sport. Now South Africa are the world champions but the All Blacks are the best team in the world & have been considered the best for over a decade. But unfortunately no matter how much I dislike the fact the AB's have not been champs since '86!
    Your argument falls short though here anyway Galaxy because the Ring belt isn't a real title either!

    The Ring title is the equivilent of the All Blacks being considered the best team in the world, it's just a subjective ranking system it's not a real belt.

    Katsidis said it best last year when he said he wanted Juan Diaz because he was the lightweight champ. When the interviewer said that Casamayor was the Ring champ Kats replied, 'yes but that's just a magazine'

    In reality, and I keep going on about this, Marquez is merely the interim WBO champ whilst Paquaio holds the far more prestigious WBC belt.

    Marquez may be the linear champ but in reality he doesn't even hold a real world title at 135.

    So your comparison to the All Blacks actually works in reverse!

    Casamayor was considered the liner champ, and Marquez bet him, but no title belt was on the line so in reality Marquez isn't even a world champ whereas Manny is the WBC lightweight champ.
    Sorry Bilbo but the Ring championship has been around a hell of a lot longer than the alphabet fools! Ring mag created the rankings system & awarded championship belts since 1922!

    I don't even recognize the alphabets. For you to say the Ring belt isn't a real title is fine cause that's your opinion but to myself & others the Ring belt is the only real championship & more prestigious than the ABC's! To me the alphabets aren't real! Anyone with enough money can create a sanctioning body so I can't see why you hold them in such high regard.

    My reference to the AB's was to show that like Pacquiao they my be the best in the world but until they win the championship they're only #1 not the champions. South Africa will remain world champs until someone wins the next world cup just like Marquez will remain champion until he is beaten in the ring at 135!
    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.

    your analogy makes no sense as your arguing that South Africa are world champs because they won the official world title crown. Well Pacquaio holds an official world title crown but Marquez doesn't.

    Furthermore Pacquaio beat Marquez only 6 months ago.

    I agree that according to the Ring rankings Marquez should be champ, we are not arguing that at all, he's the Ring champ no question, he beat the linear champ, BUT in reality Pacquaio and Campbell are above him because A) they are both genuine world champions and hold world title belts whereas Marquez does not, and Campbell beat the best lightweight in the division in Juan Diaz. Pacquaio is the p4p worlds best AND beat Marquez so he the number 1 lightweight.

    Again my rankings are NOT meant to be in accord with the Ring rankings but with reality.

    1. Paquiao
    2. Campbell
    3. Marquez


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Bilbo don't make me laugh... there's nothing genuine about the alphabet soup!

    I could create my own body called Galaxy's Boxing Council & it would have more meaning than those so called paper titles you so cherish!

    The alphabets aren't sh*t!

    Marquez is the champion & Pacquiao & Campbell are contenders!

    The reality is your only adding to the chaos! What other sport has 3 or 4 champions? Strip a title here, create a title there, 3 champs in a division here, dead boxers moving up ratings there... & it goes on & on.

    You gotta share whatever it is your smoking cause you can't be serious & say all this with a straight face!!!

    Genuine give me a break, the alphabets are a joke!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.
    Why is the Ring Belt not a title. It was a real title when Jack Dempsey defended it. The World alphabet belts have only been around since 1962, before that it WAS only the Ring title that granted true World recognition.

    What constitutes a real title? Does the organization have to rob the fighters of portions of their purses for it to be real? Does the organization have to rank unjust challengers at their number one contenders for it to be real?

    If the Ring started charging sanctioning fees and ranking Gary Locket as their number 1 contender then would you recognize it as a real title?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.
    Why is the Ring Belt not a title. It was a real title when Jack Dempsey defended it. The World alphabet belts have only been around since 1962, before that it WAS only the Ring title that granted true World recognition.

    What constitutes a real title? Does the organization have to rob the fighters of portions of their purses for it to be real? Does the organization have to rank unjust challengers at their number one contenders for it to be real?

    If the Ring started charging sanctioning fees and ranking Gary Locket as their number 1 contender then would you recognize it as a real title?
    Nice one Lance. Totally agree. If Bilbo wants to follow their mess that his choice but to say the Ring championship isn't real is just not logical! It is more real than the stripped paper alphabet titles!!!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Your argument falls short though here anyway Galaxy because the Ring belt isn't a real title either!

    The Ring title is the equivilent of the All Blacks being considered the best team in the world, it's just a subjective ranking system it's not a real belt.

    Katsidis said it best last year when he said he wanted Juan Diaz because he was the lightweight champ. When the interviewer said that Casamayor was the Ring champ Kats replied, 'yes but that's just a magazine'

    In reality, and I keep going on about this, Marquez is merely the interim WBO champ whilst Paquaio holds the far more prestigious WBC belt.

    Marquez may be the linear champ but in reality he doesn't even hold a real world title at 135.

    So your comparison to the All Blacks actually works in reverse!

    Casamayor was considered the liner champ, and Marquez bet him, but no title belt was on the line so in reality Marquez isn't even a world champ whereas Manny is the WBC lightweight champ.
    Sorry Bilbo but the Ring championship has been around a hell of a lot longer than the alphabet fools! Ring mag created the rankings system & awarded championship belts since 1922!

    I don't even recognize the alphabets. For you to say the Ring belt isn't a real title is fine cause that's your opinion but to myself & others the Ring belt is the only real championship & more prestigious than the ABC's! To me the alphabets aren't real! Anyone with enough money can create a sanctioning body so I can't see why you hold them in such high regard.

    My reference to the AB's was to show that like Pacquiao they my be the best in the world but until they win the championship they're only #1 not the champions. South Africa will remain world champs until someone wins the next world cup just like Marquez will remain champion until he is beaten in the ring at 135!
    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.

    your analogy makes no sense as your arguing that South Africa are world champs because they won the official world title crown. Well Pacquaio holds an official world title crown but Marquez doesn't.

    Furthermore Pacquaio beat Marquez only 6 months ago.

    I agree that according to the Ring rankings Marquez should be champ, we are not arguing that at all, he's the Ring champ no question, he beat the linear champ, BUT in reality Pacquaio and Campbell are above him because A) they are both genuine world champions and hold world title belts whereas Marquez does not, and Campbell beat the best lightweight in the division in Juan Diaz. Pacquaio is the p4p worlds best AND beat Marquez so he the number 1 lightweight.

    Again my rankings are NOT meant to be in accord with the Ring rankings but with reality.

    1. Paquiao
    2. Campbell
    3. Marquez

    So in your opinion, is Joe Calzaghe a two weight world champion ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post

    Sorry Bilbo but the Ring championship has been around a hell of a lot longer than the alphabet fools! Ring mag created the rankings system & awarded championship belts since 1922!

    I don't even recognize the alphabets. For you to say the Ring belt isn't a real title is fine cause that's your opinion but to myself & others the Ring belt is the only real championship & more prestigious than the ABC's! To me the alphabets aren't real! Anyone with enough money can create a sanctioning body so I can't see why you hold them in such high regard.

    My reference to the AB's was to show that like Pacquiao they my be the best in the world but until they win the championship they're only #1 not the champions. South Africa will remain world champs until someone wins the next world cup just like Marquez will remain champion until he is beaten in the ring at 135!
    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.

    your analogy makes no sense as your arguing that South Africa are world champs because they won the official world title crown. Well Pacquaio holds an official world title crown but Marquez doesn't.

    Furthermore Pacquaio beat Marquez only 6 months ago.

    I agree that according to the Ring rankings Marquez should be champ, we are not arguing that at all, he's the Ring champ no question, he beat the linear champ, BUT in reality Pacquaio and Campbell are above him because A) they are both genuine world champions and hold world title belts whereas Marquez does not, and Campbell beat the best lightweight in the division in Juan Diaz. Pacquaio is the p4p worlds best AND beat Marquez so he the number 1 lightweight.

    Again my rankings are NOT meant to be in accord with the Ring rankings but with reality.

    1. Paquiao
    2. Campbell
    3. Marquez

    So in your opinion, is Joe Calzaghe a two weight world champion ?
    Do you consider Calzaghe a double champ? Cause I sure as hell do! But if you do you your contradicting yourself... you can't recognize Calzaghe but not Casamayor. I agree the Santa Cruz decision was rotten but that's the official result & history is littered with bad decisions. The fact is Casamayor entered the Ring as champion!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Marquez is NOT a world champ at lightweight, Casa didn't have a belt when they fought.

    The Ring belt is NOT a world championship belt. You may rate it more highly than a genuine title belt but it is still NOT a world title belt.

    your analogy makes no sense as your arguing that South Africa are world champs because they won the official world title crown. Well Pacquaio holds an official world title crown but Marquez doesn't.

    Furthermore Pacquaio beat Marquez only 6 months ago.

    I agree that according to the Ring rankings Marquez should be champ, we are not arguing that at all, he's the Ring champ no question, he beat the linear champ, BUT in reality Pacquaio and Campbell are above him because A) they are both genuine world champions and hold world title belts whereas Marquez does not, and Campbell beat the best lightweight in the division in Juan Diaz. Pacquaio is the p4p worlds best AND beat Marquez so he the number 1 lightweight.

    Again my rankings are NOT meant to be in accord with the Ring rankings but with reality.

    1. Paquiao
    2. Campbell
    3. Marquez

    So in your opinion, is Joe Calzaghe a two weight world champion ?
    Do you consider Calzaghe a double champ? Cause I sure as hell do! But if you do you your contradicting yourself... you can't recognize Calzaghe but not Casamayor. I agree the Santa Cruz decision was rotten but that's the official result & history is littered with bad decisions. The fact is Casamayor entered the Ring as champion!
    How do I contradict myself ? EVERYBODY bar 2 of those crack filled judges knew Santa Cruz won that fight. It wasn't close. So yes he was the champ according to the Ring ratings. But people know how shot he looked in his past 2 fights. The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him. Therefore Nate Campbell never went above him even though he beat Juan Diaz. The number 1 in many peoples eyes bar the Ring mag. Fukk The Ring mag.

    And actually I don't consider Calzaghe a two weight world champ cuz he ain't won a WBC, WBA, WBO or IBF title at light-heavyweight. Just my opinion

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3124
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    It's surprising hardcore fans, guys that spend so much time on a site like this, are still dazzled and conned by the silly alphabet titles.

    The great man Britkid is turning in his grave.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post

    So in your opinion, is Joe Calzaghe a two weight world champion ?
    Do you consider Calzaghe a double champ? Cause I sure as hell do! But if you do you your contradicting yourself... you can't recognize Calzaghe but not Casamayor. I agree the Santa Cruz decision was rotten but that's the official result & history is littered with bad decisions. The fact is Casamayor entered the Ring as champion!
    How do I contradict myself ? EVERYBODY bar 2 of those crack filled judges knew Santa Cruz won that fight. It wasn't close. So yes he was the champ according to the Ring ratings. But people know how shot he looked in his past 2 fights. The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him. Therefore Nate Campbell never went above him even though he beat Juan Diaz. The number 1 in many peoples eyes bar the Ring mag. Fukk The Ring mag.

    And actually I don't consider Calzaghe a two weight world champ cuz he ain't won a WBC, WBA, WBO or IBF title at light-heavyweight. Just my opinion
    The Ring didn't judge the fight just followed the official result! As I've said before the best fighter in the division is not always the champion or the title would never change hands. Just because Nate beat Juan didn't make him champion. Look at Liston he was avoided for years by Patterson & considered the best fighter in the division but he only became champion by beating the champion! Now how is that system stupid? Whats stupid is being given a paper belt & having 3 or 4 other paper belt holders all claiming to be champ... but thats just my opinion!!!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post

    Do you consider Calzaghe a double champ? Cause I sure as hell do! But if you do you your contradicting yourself... you can't recognize Calzaghe but not Casamayor. I agree the Santa Cruz decision was rotten but that's the official result & history is littered with bad decisions. The fact is Casamayor entered the Ring as champion!
    How do I contradict myself ? EVERYBODY bar 2 of those crack filled judges knew Santa Cruz won that fight. It wasn't close. So yes he was the champ according to the Ring ratings. But people know how shot he looked in his past 2 fights. The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him. Therefore Nate Campbell never went above him even though he beat Juan Diaz. The number 1 in many peoples eyes bar the Ring mag. Fukk The Ring mag.

    And actually I don't consider Calzaghe a two weight world champ cuz he ain't won a WBC, WBA, WBO or IBF title at light-heavyweight. Just my opinion
    The Ring didn't judge the fight just followed the official result! As I've said before the best fighter in the division is not always the champion or the title would never change hands. Just because Nate beat Juan didn't make him champion. Look at Liston he was avoided for years by Patterson & considered the best fighter in the division but he only became champion by beating the champion! Now how is that system stupid? Whats stupid is being given a paper belt & having 3 or 4 other paper belt holders all claiming to be champ... but thats just my opinion!!!
    Why doesn't it ? Cuz he never beat the lineal champ Conamayor ? He beat Juan Diaz, the number 1 Undisputed world champion of the division. Therefore Nate becomes the Undisputed champ and number 1 of the division.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post

    How do I contradict myself ? EVERYBODY bar 2 of those crack filled judges knew Santa Cruz won that fight. It wasn't close. So yes he was the champ according to the Ring ratings. But people know how shot he looked in his past 2 fights. The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him. Therefore Nate Campbell never went above him even though he beat Juan Diaz. The number 1 in many peoples eyes bar the Ring mag. Fukk The Ring mag.

    And actually I don't consider Calzaghe a two weight world champ cuz he ain't won a WBC, WBA, WBO or IBF title at light-heavyweight. Just my opinion
    The Ring didn't judge the fight just followed the official result! As I've said before the best fighter in the division is not always the champion or the title would never change hands. Just because Nate beat Juan didn't make him champion. Look at Liston he was avoided for years by Patterson & considered the best fighter in the division but he only became champion by beating the champion! Now how is that system stupid? Whats stupid is being given a paper belt & having 3 or 4 other paper belt holders all claiming to be champ... but thats just my opinion!!!
    Why doesn't it ? Cuz he never beat the lineal champ Conamayor ? He beat Juan Diaz, the number 1 Undisputed world champion of the division. Therefore Nate becomes the Undisputed champ and number 1 of the division.
    When did Campbell become undisputed champ? Must have missed that one! The majority of the titles Diaz collected had been stripped!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him.
    If you think beating the MAN to become the MAN is stupid then maybe alphabet trinkets are more up your avenue.

    And I really wouldn't mind all the silly paper titles, but the fact is, that they dilute one another, make thinks way too confusing for the casual fan, and are a cancer to the sport. Anyone who cares enough about the sport, and wants to see its preservation should ignore the alphabet trinkets.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him.
    If you think beating the MAN to become the MAN is stupid then maybe alphabet trinkets are more up your avenue.

    And I really wouldn't mind all the silly paper titles, but the fact is, that they dilute one another, make thinks way too confusing for the casual fan, and are a cancer to the sport. Anyone who cares enough about the sport, and wants to see its preservation should ignore the alphabet trinkets.
    Oh for fukk sake.

    Simple terms.

    Joel Casamayor was the RING champion. The man at 135 pounds in the Ring mags opinion.

    Juan Diaz was the WBA, WBO, IBF champion and many bar the ring said he was the real number 1 in the division ahead of Casamayor.

    Nate Campbell beats Juan Diaz and therefore becomes the Undisputed champion and many now feel he is number one bar the ring.

    Joel Casamyor gets a gift over Santa Cruz and nearly gets beat by Michael Katsidis before throwing a left hook he will never throw again in his career. He looks shot in both them fights. Still gets the decisions so still in the Ring mags opinion is number 1 at 135 pounds.

    Juan Manuel Marquez beats Joel Casamayor. Marqeuz becomes the Ring champion.

    My view is why should Marquez now be the man at 135 pounds ? He beat Casamayor yes but Casamayor was only the number one in the Ring magazine ratings, nobody elses. Nate Campbell has fought at Lightweight numerous times and beat the recognized number 1 fighter in many peoples eyes. Therefore Nate Campbell should be number 1 in the division as he essentially beat the REAL champ, Juan Diaz.

    I ain't even gonna say why Pac should be number 2 cuz I've had enough going on now. I've made my opinion heard at least.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Boxrec make JMM No1 Lightweight. Who agrees?

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    The ring ratings works a stupid way, you have to beat the champ to replace him.
    If you think beating the MAN to become the MAN is stupid then maybe alphabet trinkets are more up your avenue.

    And I really wouldn't mind all the silly paper titles, but the fact is, that they dilute one another, make thinks way too confusing for the casual fan, and are a cancer to the sport. Anyone who cares enough about the sport, and wants to see its preservation should ignore the alphabet trinkets.
    Oh for fukk sake.

    Simple terms.

    Joel Casamayor was the RING champion. The man at 135 pounds in the Ring mags opinion.

    Juan Diaz was the WBA, WBO, IBF champion and many bar the ring said he was the real number 1 in the division ahead of Casamayor.

    Nate Campbell beats Juan Diaz and therefore becomes the Undisputed champion and many now feel he is number one bar the ring.

    Joel Casamyor gets a gift over Santa Cruz and nearly gets beat by Michael Katsidis before throwing a left hook he will never throw again in his career. He looks shot in both them fights. Still gets the decisions so still in the Ring mags opinion is number 1 at 135 pounds.

    Juan Manuel Marquez beats Joel Casamayor. Marqeuz becomes the Ring champion.

    My view is why should Marquez now be the man at 135 pounds ? He beat Casamayor yes but Casamayor was only the number one in the Ring magazine ratings, nobody elses. Nate Campbell has fought at Lightweight numerous times and beat the recognized number 1 fighter in many peoples eyes. Therefore Nate Campbell should be number 1 in the division as he essentially beat the REAL champ, Juan Diaz.

    I ain't even gonna say why Pac should be number 2 cuz I've had enough going on now. I've made my opinion heard at least.
    Diaz may have been considered the best fighter in the division but he was not the champion... theres a difference!

    All bar one of those belts that Nate holds were in possession of one of the linear champs at one time all the way back to Castillo before being stripped or given up. So essentially if it wasn't for stripping they would all be in Marquez' possession!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Gammer agrees new Williams date
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 11:47 PM
  2. Gammer agrees new Williams date
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 07:08 PM
  3. Mayweather Jr. AGREES TO WEAR REYES
    By ElTerribleMorales in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-28-2006, 11:16 PM
  4. Who agrees we have to see Hatton v Cotto!!
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-05-2006, 11:03 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing