Re: Does anybody think Valuev won?

Originally Posted by
ross
Well if I were you I wouldnt have wasted my time asking the same question again, I would have put up the unquestinable proof that Holyfield landed more punches in each round.
Either there was an official punch count or there wasnt, if there was, thatll be why Valuev wan

So for a lack of a punch count we're in the realm of hearsay, and I can tell you right now, the number of punches landed is not how you judge a fight or else there would be a requirement of punch stats on every fight.
Again your entire argument is based on hearsay just like the claim the Holyfield did steroids.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks