
Originally Posted by
hitmann

Originally Posted by
TitoFan
The answer is flat out NO.
Why should beating a fighter who's two weight divisions above his peak fighting weight make Hatton # 1? Granted, Pac whipped DLH at 147, but you can't use that as a measuring stick.
yeah, these are all points to be considered. the reason i was saying this was because if hatton wins, he will have beat the p4p number 1. Like if hatton would have beat mayweather, there could have been no arguments over who was the best p4p. But this time if he beats p4p number 1 its not so clear cut as to wheather hatton would be the best p4p.
Flawed logic does that mean if ODLH had beat Manny Pacquiao would he have been P4P number 1 ? when Vernon Forrest beat Shane Mosley who was P4P number 1, or when Antonio Tarver beating RJJ who was one of the top P4P fighters.
They got nowhere near the top spot so i don't see why Ricky Hatton should, granted Ricky Hatton has done alot more than those fighters did when they beat the top P4P fighter.
But still no way should Ricky Hatton be P4P number 1, but i do disagree with some people here regarding weight. Manny Pacquiao when he was at the lower weightclasses was only a teenager.
So obviously that isn't his natural weight, as i've said 100's times when i was 16 i was just about 140 pounds, now im 165 pounds at 19. So Manny Pacquiao moving up that much in weight.
Isn't as much as shock as people think i think Manny Pacquiao, has fully grown into his body now. And i feel 135-140 pounds is for certain his natural weight, and probably the most comfortable weight for him at this time.
So if Ricky Hatton beats Manny Pacquiao he does deserve alot of credit, and should be atleast top 6 P4P but no way does he deserve the number 1 spot.
Bookmarks