Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.


    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.


    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.


    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post



    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    A demand that will need to come into fruition in the sport at some point anyway, unless we want it to become a roided-up joke like the WWE. Why should it not happen now? Why not set a good example for the future of the sport in the biggest fight of our generation? Oh wait.. that's right, because Manny's scarred or needles, or superstitious, or whatever the excuse is this week....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post

    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    A demand that will need to come into fruition in the sport at some point anyway, unless we want it to become a roided-up joke like the WWE. Why should it not happen now? Why not set a good example for the future of the sport in the biggest fight of our generation? Oh wait.. that's right, because Manny's scarred or needles, or superstitious, or whatever the excuse is this week....
    i dont think so esp. the demand came from the mayweathers & gbp. they wont own him!

    personally i also want a clean boxing world. but it should be for ALL not only for mannyP just because the mayweathers and gbp sez so

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    849
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post

    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    A demand that will need to come into fruition in the sport at some point anyway, unless we want it to become a roided-up joke like the WWE. Why should it not happen now? Why not set a good example for the future of the sport in the biggest fight of our generation? Oh wait.. that's right, because Manny's scarred or needles, or superstitious, or whatever the excuse is this week....
    i dont think so esp. the demand came from the mayweathers & gbp. they wont own him!

    personally i also want a clean boxing world. but it should be for ALL not only for mannyP just because the mayweathers and gbp sez so
    It isn't so that everyone in boxing is juicing except for Manny (yeh right :P), he can rest assured that Floyd is undergoing exactly the same tests that he's having to do. If it's only about ego then Floyd and GBP have already bent on their idea of USADA testing to suit Manny. He can't have everything his way.

    Also, by your logic, if this was suggested by anyone but MW (governing body maybe), it would be worthwhile? Well, everyone now wants to know if Manny's been using. Silence your critics Manny, take the damn tests.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    823
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post



    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    You could also say that the penalty fee of $10 million per pound in excess of the agreed weight is the first in the history of boxing, afaik. That's just the demand of manny and his camp.

    Simply put, you can't use the excuse "fukc it, this has never been demanded before as terms in a boxing fight, so I won't do it". Much like all of manny and his camp's prior excuses as to why they won't take the random tests without any string attached.

    If it's really just a matter of pride, then the fact still lingers. Manny's refusal to take the tests has created a reservoir of ill will and doubt amongst many boxing fans and has certainly produced a blemish in pac's image that won't easily be removed by going taking the issue to court.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    269
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1045
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post



    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    Olympic style testing is better.
    Before the first drug test.........never in the history was there drug testing.
    Times move on, there has to be a first time for everything. You should always use the best that is available. This is the richest fight in history, so should be making firsts.
    Mannys refusal to do something so minor that has created something so hugh is very suspicious. Common sense tells us that if he is willing to give this up, he must be keeping something more important, and not just the upper hand in negotiations. There is no point having the upper hand in a non-fight

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    21,428
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2224
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Fantastic post Jimmy as always

    i am on this side of the fence also... and this little guy continues to impress me even when i thought he was giving all the advantages away he beats them at their own game.

    and as for ego its the nature of the beast... look at Roy jones, mayweather and not to forget Hatton these guys climb the ladder and change although i belive it was always there with mayweather hence his slave labour quote many years ago

    massive fanbase and big money fights can change the most humble of guys or atleast the team that surrounds them and why not they are the best the problem is when they meet a mirror ego imageand sometimes the fans lose out.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post



    tell that to the NSAC.

    NO PROOFS NO EVIDENCE, ALL BASELESS ACCUSATIONS SPECULATION
    Manny refuses to give us the proof that he's innocent. All he has to do is to give a few teaspoons of blood, yet he refuses to do it and is making endless ridiculous excuses for not doing so even though he's losing a $40 million payday and his reputation by continuing to refuse. Why won't he give us the proof?
    NEVER in the history of boxing has there been any "olympic style" random bloodtesting. its just the demand of the mayweathers/gbp.

    mannyP has NEVER FAILED any medical tests given by ALL boxing governing bodies

    lets see what happens next...
    That's what the baseball drug cheats said. And there was no testing in baseball because there was no steroid cheating in baseball up until the end of last century. As soon as they brought it in they caught a bunch of drug cheats.

    Manny hasn't failed any tests but neither did Sugar Shane, Marion Jones, a bunch of other people who we now know were drug cheats.

    Since this blew up before Christmas Manny's actions and public statements are those of a guilty man.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.
    You almost had a fair post until the bolded one.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.
    You almost had a fair post until the bolded one.
    He never won another fight again after that and just before that he'd finished the Barrera trilogy which was a career-ender in itself. Hard to argue he was still at his peak.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1084
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.
    You almost had a fair post until the bolded one.
    i guess he forgot how that pre fight negotiations went. how erik got all his demands. like using the winning gloves, blood drawn 2 days before the fight. i guess if you lose to a completely shot morales you dont deserve to win anymore after that huh?
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    827
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Manny beating Oscar I can understand. Oscar was a shell of his former self fighting at a weight he hadn't been at for a decade. He was dead at the weight, couldn't rehydrate and was basically a mobile punchbag. Hatton wasn't quite that far gone but far enough gone and from the first post in the thread it looks like the rumours about him getting beaten up by his sparring partners were true. But it's the Cotto fight that got me. Cotto definitely was on the slide but it's the way he got beaten up for the duration of the fight. It's like Cotto was the ex-106 pounder and Manny was the guy whose normal weight is over 160. I can accept the weight gain over the past five years, I'm aware he weighed around 140 in the ring for fights five years ago. I can accept he's improved a lot as a boxer over the last five years. But I'm having trouble accepting that he's kept his power and can beat up big elite welters. You just don't go from losing to a completely shot Erik Morales at 129 five years ago to beating up top welterweights without something going on.
    You almost had a fair post until the bolded one.
    i guess he forgot how that pre fight negotiations went. how erik got all his demands. like using the winning gloves, blood drawn 2 days before the fight. i guess if you lose to a completely shot morales you dont deserve to win anymore after that huh?
    So Manny can have blood drawn shortly before a fight then. So there's even less of an excuse for him to not agree to the random testing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Top 20 P4P Debate
    By gest12645 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 09:13 PM
  2. HW DEBATE
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 03:37 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 02:52 PM
  4. Pride vs UFC debate
    By VictorCharlie in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 06:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing