
Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
marbleheadmaui

Originally Posted by
Fenster
Yeah it would have been far better if a couple of hundred teenagers on a mile wide island were all packing shooters.
No way that's a recipe for utter carnage.
No, actually it isn't. If it were? The NRA Convention would have mass killings every year.
There are mass killings every year for people that own guns.
Yup. And for every one there are literally THOUSANDS of meetings among people carrying where there is no violence whatsoever.
Yup. You can't shoot someone if you don't have a gun.
LOL yeah and THAT'S why nobody ever kills with a knife or a rope or a club or their hands or a car or a fertilizer bomb etc.
The right answer is of course being able to meet such a threat with a gun. I have done so twice in my life.
I'll take my chances against a knife, rope, hands or club over a gun.
You've been in two gun fights? I love a good western. How'd it go?
Nope. Fights weren't necessary. I pumped the shotgun on one occasion and the guy who had broken into my house ran and on the second occasion I fired over the heads of three guys with bats. They chose not to proceed.
The point you are missing is if YOU have a gun? You needn't take any chance at all, or at least far less often.
Unless you are silly enough to think criminals/bad guys actually go unarmed because the law says they must.
Bookmarks