Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 83

Thread: Clottey v. Pacquiao

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Pacman beat Marquez respectably...and by that I mean coming at the weight he agreed upon, and having himself weighed just before the fight. Not coming in overweight so he could have the advantage, and then keeping pre fight weight a secret before the fight. Pac-man beats Clottey hands down. Clottey would sit there and let Pac-man whale on him and 1 or 6 of those punches is gonna get through. I hope pac-man puts in the contract for his fight with mayweather that floyd HAS to come in at the agreed upon weight, no excuses, no acceptions. What floyd did by not making weight in that last fight was very disrespectful to Marquez

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,124
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3094
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    No one wants to fight Clottey unless they really really have to and even Shane gave him a miss because he has no belt. Clottey is bigger but he is one paced and could be outboxed which is what Pac may do.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Quote Originally Posted by 15rounder View Post
    Pacman beat Marquez respectably...and by that I mean coming at the weight he agreed upon, and having himself weighed just before the fight. Not coming in overweight so he could have the advantage, and then keeping pre fight weight a secret before the fight. Pac-man beats Clottey hands down. Clottey would sit there and let Pac-man whale on him and 1 or 6 of those punches is gonna get through. I hope pac-man puts in the contract for his fight with mayweather that floyd HAS to come in at the agreed upon weight, no excuses, no acceptions. What floyd did by not making weight in that last fight was very disrespectful to Marquez
    im pretty sure all fight contracts have the agreed weight in,floyd will make 147 he doesnt need to cheat it

    if he did come in at 148,149 in theory pac should walk away from the fight... but will he after training camp and turn down a big pay day

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Granted...But i didn't think Floyd would cheat on the Marquez fight either, but essentially that is what he did. I don't know. Something is irking me about this. For some reason I don't think that fight is going to happen

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Quote Originally Posted by 15rounder View Post
    Granted...But i didn't think Floyd would cheat on the Marquez fight either, but essentially that is what he did. I don't know. Something is irking me about this. For some reason I don't think that fight is going to happen
    there was a bit of confusion about whether the fight was 144 or 147 lb beforehand.... maybe it was floyd making a point that he makes the rules... who knows, i definitley dont think he needed to do this to win

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    On that point, I agree with you. He could have won that fight at 120 if he wanted to. I just get the feeling that when everything is said and done, Floyd is going to lay down too many rules, or something of that nature to tank this fight. Manny will fight under any circumstances in my opinion...he'll fight in a pile of shit if it's going to please the fans...I just have a feeling the mayweather camp is going to tank this somehow...I'm gonna start another thread...I want you to tell me what you think of it...it'll be up in a bit

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    437
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    817
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Too much is being made of Floyd's weight. That was one time and Floyd paid the price. The fact is he had been off a long time and while he stayed in shape, he probably wasn't watching his weight and had to come down by a significant amount. He was ONE pound off. Let's not act like the fight was decided by what Floyd WEIGHED.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    256
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Correction...2 lbs. off (which does make a difference) and refused to be weighed on the unofficial scale. Who knows what he really weighed in that fight.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Quote Originally Posted by 15rounder View Post
    Correction...2 lbs. off (which does make a difference) and refused to be weighed on the unofficial scale. Who knows what he really weighed in that fight.

    i dont think he would have been any lighter on the night of the fight if had weighed in at 144, i think it was more a principle thing of him showing who is boss

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1497
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    I think mayweather not making 144 was bad more because of a respect thing in my mind, I really don't think he would have had any problem making 143 or 144 especially after seeing a bigger Miguel Cotto make 145 pretty easily. I also don't think Mayweather, who doesn't use size and strength, and a huge advantage because he came in at 146. He was too fast and too good for Marquez, and their styles much like Ward-Kessler just don't match up well for the orthodox boxer because their style isn't as good at a distance which is where Floyd kept the fight.

    Clottey is pretty big, but he doesn't have a lot of power and he doesn't fight like Hatton on the inside, If he was taller I could see size being a problem for Manny, but Clottey's size in this fight just basically makes him a more durable fighter.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    I see the jab as being the key weapon to beat Pac. Cotto had some success with it as did JMM so Clottey could very well give him hell with his jab and defense plus hes a good sized welter.

    If he handles Floyd easily Ill be convinced he could handle any style.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    833
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Clottey would be a very tough fight for Pacquiao.

    I would actually pick Clottey to win. Clottey has a tight guard, can take a good punch when he has to and his offensive game is underated. Clottey has a solid jab, sneaky right hand and is good at putting punches together plus he is way natural bigger than Pacquiao.

    Clottey's workrate could be his downfall because Pacquiao is an offensive manchine who can punch constantly for 12 rounds.
    How many times do we have to heed the lessons of the past to look at the bright light?

    Clottey is just the same as cotto. diaz. hatton. de la hoya. a guy who goes straight to his foes. That's what pac wants. and he's going to get brutalized by pac while pac is giving him different angles. A tight guard doe'snt mean a thing when your opponent is faster than you and has great footwork. Those 2 attributes pac has. and just like what you said clottey's work rate is his down fall and believe me it will. Pac would'nt give clottey a moment to breathe during his fast assault. And speed kills. most especially if:
    1. the other guy is bigger therefore slower
    2. the other guy doe'snt counter well in the league of jmm.pbf. and casa.
    3. the other guy is not a slick. elusive fighter like pernell or pbf.

    And that's the bottomline...

  13. #28
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,742
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2017
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    I thought DLH would be too big for Pac.
    I thought Hatton would be too big for Pac.
    I thought Cotto would be too big for Pac.

    So.......

    I think Clottey would be too big for Pac.

    (Just kidding)

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Clottey would be a very tough fight for Pacquiao.

    I would actually pick Clottey to win. Clottey has a tight guard, can take a good punch when he has to and his offensive game is underated. Clottey has a solid jab, sneaky right hand and is good at putting punches together plus he is way natural bigger than Pacquiao.

    Clottey's workrate could be his downfall because Pacquiao is an offensive manchine who can punch constantly for 12 rounds.
    How many times do we have to heed the lessons of the past to look at the bright light?

    Clottey is just the same as cotto. diaz. hatton. de la hoya. a guy who goes straight to his foes. That's what pac wants. and he's going to get brutalized by pac while pac is giving him different angles. A tight guard doe'snt mean a thing when your opponent is faster than you and has great footwork. Those 2 attributes pac has. and just like what you said clottey's work rate is his down fall and believe me it will. Pac would'nt give clottey a moment to breathe during his fast assault. And speed kills. most especially if:
    1. the other guy is bigger therefore slower
    2. the other guy doe'snt counter well in the league of jmm.pbf. and casa.
    3. the other guy is not a slick. elusive fighter like pernell or pbf.

    And that's the bottomline...
    Yes but a good stiff jab can offset all that action, as we'll probably see in the Mayweather fight.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Clottey v. Pacquiao

    i think clottey can definitely beat pacquiao but this fight will never happen because roach would never risk his cashcow pacquiao against a very dangerous fighter. besides, clottey wouldn't bring in the big bucks that pacquiao now demands. i also think clottey would walk through pacquiao's punches unlike cotto who's punch resistance isn't as good as clottey's. i also think clottey's superior jab would give pacquiao all kinds of problems and would have him dazed and confused. morales and marquez showed the way to beat pacquiao and that is by using a very good strong jab to keep pacquiao off balance. i think clottey wins this one in a war by late TKO.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-14-2009, 02:31 AM
  2. Clottey can win
    By terrorsid in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 03:13 PM
  3. About Clottey being so big
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 08:21 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-30-2008, 12:47 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-07-2007, 07:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing