Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
I suppose if you count there era from the Brewster fight onwards then yeah they are dominating.

Thats like being the the retarded bully in primary school and the year above him has just moved up to secondary.

I still say that the contenders in the eighties are far more skilled than the Kiltschkos today.
name in what way Bonecrusher Smith, Pinklon Thomas, Tony Tucker, Tony Tubbs, Marvis Frazier, Buster Douglas, Frank Bruno, Razor Ruddock, Henry Tillman, Alex Stewart, and Bruce Seldon, are better than Chris Arreola, Hasim Rahman, David Haye, Tomasz Adamek, Samuel Peter, Ruslan Chagaev, Sultan Ibragimov, Lamon Brewster, Chris Byrd, Jameel McCline etc.
Fucking hell this gets more ridiculous! Just read back what you have put and youll think "oh yeah, Areola is shit, he got beat by a mediocre light heavy"

That was just silly...

As for the names you mentioned Tyson could have fought. He was out of boxing for 4 years while they were getting established and as for Mercer (who went on to decapitate Morrison) one of Mikes victims gave him a boxing lesson
all of the names that Lyle mentioned were still fighting long after Tyson's prison sentence, Tyson was already back in the ring in 95 the same year Holyfield lost by TKO to Bowe, why didn't Mike take that fight? and you bash Arreola losing to a former lineal Cruiserweight champion hahaha the irony

once again, the ONLY FRAZIER MIKE TYSON WOULD EVER BEAT IS THE ONE HE DID, AND THAT'S MARVIS FRAZIER, JOE WOULD GUT'EM!!!