Top fighters out of every country

[ElTerribleMorales]

Hernandez doesn't deserve to be ahead of any of the fighters I named, so you can't use Boxrec as evidence of Lopez being overrated then go ahead and say that the Boxrec rankings are flawed, they're flawed in every sense especially if they have Ricardo Lopez that low, as for blasting Sanchez, well he's basically IMO on the same level of someone like Ramirez, always fought the best but didn't beat the best, and I do read your posts and stop half way cause it's not the truth all I read is biased ignorant bullshit, all you seem to post is farfetched opinions that are based on opinions rather than FACT, ffs you said that Morales given his resume doesn't belong in the top 10 due to the fact that he has 2 stoppage losses, regardless of the fact that A) it was against Manny Pacquiao and B) that Morales was passed his best, you seriously need to LEARN what you're trying to talk about cause you're just coming off sounding clueless

Sanchez' not like Ramirez , because Sanchez lost always by stoppage (Xcept 4 Calderon when he uncharacteristically lost by decision) . Ramirez won against Rosario and Whitaker and deserved 2 win vs Arguello as well and at least a draw in d 1st Rosario fight . "El Nene" always got his S drilled then handed 2 him . Ramirez was only stopped 1ce when he still was a novice from n Olivares body punch (and no1 2 verify if it was legit and not low) . "El Nene" made himself a name by being Sascha Grey like if u know what i mean . Then consider that d "best" that Ramirez fought were much better than d "best" that "El Nene" fought , sometimes beat and was never humiliated , except maybe 1 time , and "El Nene" , well , he was d Bukkake of his division .


Show me where i claimed that Morales does not belong in Mexico's top 10 so i can edit and fix it .
Would u ?

Whose posts r u replying 2 ? seemingly not some1 who posted in this thread .

hahaha so now without seeing a single fight of his you can determine just on paper that Sanchez was no good, he was far from great just like Ramirez but was decent enough and only lost to top guys, difference though his wins were all his, unlike the gift given to Ramirez in France against Whitaker, the fact that you try to build up Ramirez to be better than Morales in any sense is an insult, seeing how Morales was a notch higher in every department, skill, talent, and resume, Vargas lost every fight he had by TKO (besides his loss to Mayorga), does that make him a bum? simply put I'm done going in circles cause well there's no point in arguing with someone who has no logic, and sir that's exactly what you are =/

Xactly , "El Nene" was no good , and trying 2 seriously equate him 2 Ramirez is n insult .
Ramirez was rightfully awarded d decision over Whitaker .
Vargas was not a bum but far from great . I'd consider Vargas a lot better than Alex Sanchez and a lot worse than Ramirez .

yea Ramirez was as rightfully rewarded the decision as Bradley was against Pacquiao, as Casamayor was against Santa Cruz, and as Chavez was against well Whitaker, again you're saying that Sanchez was "no good" without having seen a single fight of his yet you try to build yourself up as an expert on Mexican and Puerto Rican fighters because you've seen a couple Ramirez fights, claiming that we haven't seen the fights you've mentioned just cause well we don't agree with your claims that Ramirez is anywhere close to being top 5 best at anything, keep fooling yourself bro cause the fact that no one here agrees with you just speaks volumes