Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44

Thread: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    781
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mightyfighter View Post
    I don't think this will be an easy fight for Froch. Stevenson's dangerous at all times.
    Absolutely, a puncher always has a chance. I see Froch winning but don't discount Stevenson too much. It's a long way from street gangs in Haiti to where Stevenson is now which means he has some smarts, an important component in every fighters bag.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Antelope Valley, California
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    781
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by palmerq View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    After years of fighting the best fighters I guess he deserves to fight at least a couple of pricks.
    Stevesons no bum. Packs one hell of a punch. I deffo give him a shot against Froch
    stevenson is his mandatory i am quite sure... i also thought that this was a plan by whichever governing body made him number 1 contendor to get the belt back to bute S:.. make some canadian mandatory and threaten to strip froch of the belt if he don't fight him when froch is on the doorstep of some big money fights v kessler and ward again S:..... strip froch so stevenson and bute fight for the vacant title and then bute can win and go back into hiding in canada.... but froch has blocked this plan by taking the fight S: errrr this makes sense in my head anyway..
    Nah. I said from the start maybe not as often here that Kessler has lost the edge. He doesn't have it anymore and I could see it when he exited the tourney. With all his bravado and agreeing to the 2 mil a piece and going to Nottingham bla bla bla. He knew dam well all along that Froch had a mandatory coming up and if he would have agreed to fight Froch that it would have most likely been postponed given Froch agreeing to fight Stevenson within 90 days after Kessler should he have won. I predict that Kessler will not fight an elite fighter at 168 and will either retire after a variety of pastry chefs with his trinket or move to 175 for some other weak trinket.
    Man, IamInuit, I don't know what Kessler did but you are down on that dude!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by palmerq View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    After years of fighting the best fighters I guess he deserves to fight at least a couple of pricks.
    Stevesons no bum. Packs one hell of a punch. I deffo give him a shot against Froch
    stevenson is his mandatory i am quite sure... i also thought that this was a plan by whichever governing body made him number 1 contendor to get the belt back to bute S:.. make some canadian mandatory and threaten to strip froch of the belt if he don't fight him when froch is on the doorstep of some big money fights v kessler and ward again S:..... strip froch so stevenson and bute fight for the vacant title and then bute can win and go back into hiding in canada.... but froch has blocked this plan by taking the fight S: errrr this makes sense in my head anyway..
    Nah. I said from the start maybe not as often here that Kessler has lost the edge. He doesn't have it anymore and I could see it when he exited the tourney. With all his bravado and agreeing to the 2 mil a piece and going to Nottingham bla bla bla. He knew dam well all along that Froch had a mandatory coming up and if he would have agreed to fight Froch that it would have most likely been postponed given Froch agreeing to fight Stevenson within 90 days after Kessler should he have won. I predict that Kessler will not fight an elite fighter at 168 and will either retire after a variety of pastry chefs with his trinket or move to 175 for some other weak trinket.
    Man, IamInuit, I don't know what Kessler did but you are down on that dude!

    I used to like him but he has become a bit of a poser. He's starting to remind me of Sven Ottke. It can be traced back to the Calzaghe fight. Joe took away his air of invincibility and I think that changed him. Ward and Froch took his soul. Its nothing personal as he seems like a nice enough guy but I just don't think he has it anymore and is paranoid to leave Denmark or fight the top dogs. I hope I'm wrong but I think he will be satisfied to have one of the many "regular" titles flogged around boxing and his stalwart fans that will lap it up and believe its everyone elses fault as to why he toils with no hopers.

    Again I hope I'm wrong and will be happy to eat crow if I am.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Stevenson Confident He Can Beat, Knock Carl Froch Out - Boxing News

    Froch isnt going to get knocked out by Stevenson.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Shamokin, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Here's Saddoboxings story on it, http://www.saddoboxing.com/20567-froch-kessler-stevenson.html

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Canada
    Posts
    9,793
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mightyfighter View Post
    I don't think this will be an easy fight for Froch. Stevenson's dangerous at all times.
    Absolutely, a puncher always has a chance. I see Froch winning but don't discount Stevenson too much. It's a long way from street gangs in Haiti to where Stevenson is now which means he has some smarts, an important component in every fighters bag.
    Yeah but one could argue that such an experience in Haiti and for a time here has helped to prepare him for this as it did for many greats that were in gangs or in trouble. Guys like Ketchel were not nice guys and Benny Leonard learned how to fight in the Jewish Ghetto. Live the thug and be the thug in order to survive choosing more often then not to fight over flight. This will serve him well when he walks to the ring in Nottingham. I just don't see him being as intimidated as others walking into that atmosphere. In fact he probably feeds on it.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by beenKOed View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by palmerq View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vendettos View Post
    After years of fighting the best fighters I guess he deserves to fight at least a couple of pricks.
    Stevesons no bum. Packs one hell of a punch. I deffo give him a shot against Froch
    stevenson is his mandatory i am quite sure... i also thought that this was a plan by whichever governing body made him number 1 contendor to get the belt back to bute S:.. make some canadian mandatory and threaten to strip froch of the belt if he don't fight him when froch is on the doorstep of some big money fights v kessler and ward again S:..... strip froch so stevenson and bute fight for the vacant title and then bute can win and go back into hiding in canada.... but froch has blocked this plan by taking the fight S: errrr this makes sense in my head anyway..
    Nah. I said from the start maybe not as often here that Kessler has lost the edge. He doesn't have it anymore and I could see it when he exited the tourney. With all his bravado and agreeing to the 2 mil a piece and going to Nottingham bla bla bla. He knew dam well all along that Froch had a mandatory coming up and if he would have agreed to fight Froch that it would have most likely been postponed given Froch agreeing to fight Stevenson within 90 days after Kessler should he have won. I predict that Kessler will not fight an elite fighter at 168 and will either retire after a variety of pastry chefs with his trinket or move to 175 for some other weak trinket.
    Man, IamInuit, I don't know what Kessler did but you are down on that dude!

    I used to like him but he has become a bit of a poser. He's starting to remind me of Sven Ottke. It can be traced back to the Calzaghe fight. Joe took away his air of invincibility and I think that changed him. Ward and Froch took his soul. Its nothing personal as he seems like a nice enough guy but I just don't think he has it anymore and is paranoid to leave Denmark or fight the top dogs. I hope I'm wrong but I think he will be satisfied to have one of the many "regular" titles flogged around boxing and his stalwart fans that will lap it up and believe its everyone elses fault as to why he toils with no hopers.

    Again I hope I'm wrong and will be happy to eat crow if I am.
    Kessler still has β€œit” he was wobbled by Green but knocked him out in good style.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler


  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    http://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-froch-situation-sorted-next-few-days--61200

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Froch only brings 70% to the pot if you include the British gate money. Froch Kessler 2 can sell out a stadium in Denmark as easily as it can in England and then Kessler is bringing 70% to the pot.

    We have a pretty good idea how the fight will go. An all action fight that could go either way on the cards after twelve rounds. If it's in Denmark Kessler probably gets the decision. If it's in England Froch probably gets the decision.

    Froch is the one desperate for the rematch. Why should Kessler come over to England and probably lose when he can have the fight in Denmark and probably win? The record books aren't going to worry about where the fights were held, they're just going to record who won.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Froch only brings 70% to the pot if you include the British gate money. Froch Kessler 2 can sell out a stadium in Denmark as easily as it can in England and then Kessler is bringing 70% to the pot.

    We have a pretty good idea how the fight will go. An all action fight that could go either way on the cards after twelve rounds. If it's in Denmark Kessler probably gets the decision. If it's in England Froch probably gets the decision.

    Froch is the one desperate for the rematch. Why should Kessler come over to England and probably lose when he can have the fight in Denmark and probably win? The record books aren't going to worry about where the fights were held, they're just going to record who won.
    I think it's fair that Froch should get the Uk return as he travelled in the first place. Hearn has also put in the contract that they can have a third fight in a netural venue which seems like the fairest offer going. Kessler is confident enough in his ability and he said he would beat Froch again, if he's that confident he will travel this time.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1396
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Froch only brings 70% to the pot if you include the British gate money. Froch Kessler 2 can sell out a stadium in Denmark as easily as it can in England and then Kessler is bringing 70% to the pot.

    We have a pretty good idea how the fight will go. An all action fight that could go either way on the cards after twelve rounds. If it's in Denmark Kessler probably gets the decision. If it's in England Froch probably gets the decision.

    Froch is the one desperate for the rematch. Why should Kessler come over to England and probably lose when he can have the fight in Denmark and probably win? The record books aren't going to worry about where the fights were held, they're just going to record who won.
    Id bet that Kessler is more of a national hero in Denmark than Froch is in England. Unfortunately for Carl as good as he is and as good his opponents have been he just hasnt had the exposure needed to be a massive draw like Hatton. Granted, hes not really going to appeal to the same dunce football hooligans that Hatton does but even Calzaghe managed to get 55,000 in a stadium to watch Kessler.

    It cant all be that its down to Froch fighting on sky and not terrestrial as Hamed and Calzaghe both fought on sky and even pay per view but both got massive audineces and headlines. In fact Froch started out on the BBC. His style just isnt as eye pleasing.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    I believe Froch fight with Bute was a brilliant atmosphere and attendance.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch vs. Stevenson for April/May time, No agreement for Kessler

    IBF champion Carl Froch set to confirm fight plans within the week | Sky Sports

    Just saw this. Hopefully it's Kessler but I think it'll be Stevenson.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-03-2013, 06:45 PM
  2. Froch-Kessler WTF is kessler doing in this photo
    By Saddo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-30-2010, 06:37 PM
  3. Froch v Kessler 24th April not 17th 2010
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-12-2010, 09:02 PM
  4. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-08-2009, 02:12 PM
  5. Tyson on Froch v Taylor undercard, 25th April?
    By clintuk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 04:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing