Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
You are the one getting upset and name calling. Not me.

I have no doubt the opponents that GGG beat would have beaten Brook at middleweight. There is a reason why Brook fights at welterweight because he is not a middleweight to begin with and he would not be half as successful. Brook got an opportunity and he tried but he could never live up to the middleweights if he campaigned there.
Yeah you've already said that. Did I ever say your opinion is wrong? No. When you claimed Brook did better because "Golovkin let him" I said - "fair enough," I didn't even dispute it regardless of how pathetic an answer it is.

However, If you claim to have "relevant facts" then you have to produce them when challenged. Your opinion doesn't count as a relevant fact.

(I never resort to name calling, I am totally consistent in pointing out idiotic statements/opinions)
Your opinion that the "middleweight" Brook would beat the shit out of three and school the other two is wrong. If it was true Kell would have been campaigning at the weight.

Look back at your posts you have been the one resorting to name calling.