Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
I did.
In my own, subtle, humorous way.



I debunked several of his myths in the span of 2-3 posts awhile back.

I can't see a single post you made that had anything to do with what I've said.

Feel free to show me.


Wow..... really?



Here you go Fenst..... just for you.



Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
I thought I made it clear that I said "clear" as I based it on talent/skill/abilty more than records. Clearly I didn't make that clear ().

@Master - Brook weighed 160 like all Golovkin's other middleweight opponents. It's irrelevant though as you've stated Golovkin let him do better than the others.

If you believe it's illogical that fighters moving up in weight can't be tougher than men that already fight at the weight, I suggest you take a look back through the history of boxing. You will get the shock of your life mate.

Seriously, these fighters will blow your mind - start with a Filipino fella named Manny Pacquiao, Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Leonard, Hearns, De La Hoya, Ricky Burns, Duke McKenzie.


All the fighters you mentioned, and you could include a few others as well, worked their way up through the weight divisions. Brook had fought exclusively at welter and jumped up to middleweight in one fell swoop to challenge one of the best MW's in history out of the blue. Big difference. Once he gets beaten he goes right back down. Again... big difference. Not taking anything away from the man. But it was a bad experiment gone wrong. Brook couldn't hurt GGG, and they both knew it.

I bolded the above in red, just 'cause I'm a nice guy. Maybe it's a cultural issue/ difference.... but I could've sworn my comments had everything to do with what you just said.

Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
BTW, I love the name placement of "fighters that will blow your mind".


Pacquiao, Duran, Leonard, Hearns................. Ricky Burns, Duke McKenzie.

Fame by association.

Ok here I was just piling on....



Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
..... and while we're destroying myths, no amount of snake-oil salesmanship is going to convince me or most boxing fans that Lomachenko, with an 8-1 professional record, should be boxing's p4p #1. He may have more natural ability than anyone in boxing right now. That much we can argue about. But leapfrogging him over the top of fighters who have actually built a career already, many with plenty of quality wins? I'll pass on that one for the time being.

Here I was just debunking your claims about Loma.
So I'm puzzled as to why you believe nothing I said had anything to do with anything you said.