Quote Originally Posted by frankenfrank View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
yea Ramirez was as rightfully rewarded the decision as Bradley was against Pacquiao, as Casamayor was against Santa Cruz, and as Chavez was against well Whitaker, again you're saying that Sanchez was "no good" without having seen a single fight of his yet you try to build yourself up as an expert on Mexican and Puerto Rican fighters because you've seen a couple Ramirez fights, claiming that we haven't seen the fights you've mentioned just cause well we don't agree with your claims that Ramirez is anywhere close to being top 5 best at anything, keep fooling yourself bro cause the fact that no one here agrees with you just speaks volumes
Bradley against Pacquiao was a bad decision , d rest u mentioned i haven't watched yet but i doubt that u had , because i don't count watching highlights , skipping parts and fast 4warding as watching a fight . A man who systematically proven as being unable 2 defend himself is not good . I haven't seen just a couple of Ramirez fights , but u obviously haven't even watched "a couple" of Ramirez' fights . I M flattered 2 being disagreed with with PPL whom post such ignorant replies . It's a positive feedback 4 me .
unlike you buddy I actually know boxing, am on here pretty much for every meaningful fight posting while watching the fight live, thing is the only one here rambling on like an ignorant retard is you , if the only thing you base as being a great fighter is durability then fuck me you must have Tommy Hearns at the bottom of the barrel, Bradley/Pacquiao decision was just as bad as Whitaker/Ramirez I, if anything less so because at least Bradley was competitive with Manny, Ramirez at no point was competitive against the man who boxed circles around him and made him look like an amateur or as you put it a cab driver