Quote Originally Posted by IamInuit View Post
Quote Originally Posted by justaguy View Post
I think Floyd is much better than an ordinary fighter in the 70's and 80's - he is very smart and adaptable in the ring. The title of the article is ridiculous. If he said that Floyd wouldn't have been undefeated, I can go with that.

Exactly and that will probably be the one thing other then the phantom fight that historians will hold against him. His inactivity levels. However I suppose one has to take into account that he made on average 20 million dollars a fight while guys like Montiel never got a 7 figure payday until he fought Donaire. People keep accusing him of ducking but it simply cant be shown. Would other fighters have fought as much as they did earning that kind of money? No way to show that w/o a time machine. Had he been in the era of the fab 4 or 5 he most likely would have fought all of them or most of them.
I don't think he'd fare all that well against Duran at 135 but when you see how Duran struggled against Benitez its certainly not far fetched that he would struggle with Floyd at 147 or 154.
He didn't make 7 figures for the Donaire fight

Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

We will never know how duran would fair in this era and floyd in durans era.

Lets also not discredit other current fighters as duran is not everyones ATG.

Floyd has the advantage over duran and obviously duran is jealous to be making those comments.

Theres no escaping the fact duran was a great lightweight and he would be a problem in any era but i just feel he wouldnt beat floyd.

Just like a prime vlad wouldnt beat a prime larry holmes..it works both ways.
Wlad would be a bad styles match up for Holmes.