In the first quote, I identified above, you go on about big fights generating tax money and a conflict of interest that the NSAC has managing the regulations of the sport. I have already explained to you the basics of how of the rules are made so that there is no motivation for corruption. If you think there is a conflict interest with the way NSAC manages the sport and implements policy, identify the "specific conflict". If you can do that with facts to backup your statement, I would most likely have to agree with you. But making general corruption statements without identifying any motivation says absolutely nothing is easily dismissed as unwarranted governmental conspiracy theory rhetoric.
In the second quote, You make a bold statement that the testing the NSAC does is not good enough. Provide specific facts that identify the poor qualify of the testing related to good quality testing and how they are going to address the testing procedure deficiencies. Your facts should identify the type of banded substances they fail to identify and why what they do is such poor quality. Your facts should also identify the a good quality method of testing that the NASC should follow in order to correct it's deficiencies.
Now with your expert advise I'm sure we can get GBP, Top Rank and other big promoters conducting events to put up the $9K-$15K budget short fall the commission needs to implement a good quality PED testing program.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks